1969 Nissan Cedric vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (168 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1969 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo S40 (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Nissan Cedric | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Cedric | S40 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |
