1969 Nissan Cedric vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 105 kg more than 2006 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Nissan Cedric | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Cedric | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 236 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 361 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2800 mm |
