1969 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 639 kg more than 1969 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | Cedric | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 365 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3052 mm |