1969 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Kia Forte
To start off, 2013 Kia Forte is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia Forte (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia Forte weights approximately 58 kg more than 1969 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Kia Forte (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Kia Forte | |
| Make | Nissan | Kia |
| Model | Cedric | Forte |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1348 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1775 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |
