1969 Nissan Laurel vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Laurel would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Laurel. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Laurel.
Because 1969 Nissan Laurel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Nissan Laurel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Laurel. (155 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Laurel.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Nissan Laurel | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Laurel | E-350 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1813 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2619 mm |