1969 NSU 1000 vs. 1996 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Swift is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 1,177 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 NSU 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 NSU 1000 (64 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Swift. (55 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 NSU 1000 should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Swift.
Because 1969 NSU 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 NSU 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 NSU 1000 (90 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Swift. (74 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 NSU 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 NSU 1000 | 1996 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | NSU | Suzuki |
| Model | 1000 | Swift |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1177 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2270 mm |
