1969 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1969 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1969 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Crown weights approximately 61 kg more than 1969 NSU Ro 80.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1969 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 NSU Ro 80 | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | NSU | Toyota |
| Model | Ro 80 | Crown |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1837 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 188 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 22.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 61 L |
