1969 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Opel Ascona is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1969 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Opel Ascona (115 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1969 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1969 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 122 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (150 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1969 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1969 NSU Ro 80 | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | NSU | Opel |
Model | Ro 80 | Ascona |
Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 1072 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2600 mm |