1969 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1982 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1982 Zastava 2101 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1969 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 234 kg more than 1982 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1969 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 2101. 1969 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 NSU Ro 80 | 1982 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | NSU | Zastava |
Model | Ro 80 | 2101 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2430 mm |