1969 Oldsmobile 442 vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile 442 would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile 442 weights approximately 194 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile 442 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile 442. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Oldsmobile 442 | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
| Model | 442 | HHR |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6556 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1431 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4475 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1603 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2629 mm |
