1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1963 Trabant Universal
To start off, 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Trabant Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Trabant Universal would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1963 Trabant Universal.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Trabant Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1963 Trabant Universal | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Trabant |
Model | Cutlass | Universal |
Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7446 cc | 595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2030 mm |