1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2011 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 563 kg more than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Traverse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2011 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
Model | Cutlass | Traverse |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5736 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2173 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5207 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1991 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3020 mm |