1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1042 kg more than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
| Model | Cutlass | Expedition |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5736 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5245 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2332 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3023 mm |
