1969 Opel Admiral vs. 1962 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1969 Opel Admiral is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,784 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Opel Admiral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Opel Admiral (142 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1962 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Opel Admiral should accelerate faster than 1962 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Opel Admiral weights approximately 220 kg more than 1962 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Opel Admiral (227 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1969 Opel Admiral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Opel Admiral | 1962 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Opel | Toyota |
| Model | Admiral | Crown |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2784 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 227 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69.8 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 22.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 75 L |
