1969 Peugeot 204 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1969 Peugeot 204. (47 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1969 Peugeot 204.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Renault Clio (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Peugeot 204. (84 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Peugeot 204.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Peugeot 204 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 204 | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1130 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 21.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |