1969 Plymouth Barracuda vs. 2000 Chevrolet S-10
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 6,285 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Plymouth Barracuda (190 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. (119 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Plymouth Barracuda should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet S-10.
Because 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Plymouth Barracuda (414 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. (190 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 Plymouth Barracuda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet S-10.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Plymouth Barracuda | 2000 Chevrolet S-10 | |
Make | Plymouth | Chevrolet |
Model | Barracuda | S-10 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6285 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 414 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3130 mm |