1969 Plymouth Barracuda vs. 2008 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2008 Toyota Camry is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Plymouth Barracuda weights approximately 141 kg more than 2008 Toyota Camry.
Because 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Plymouth Barracuda (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Camry. (187 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1969 Plymouth Barracuda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Plymouth Barracuda | 2008 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Plymouth | Toyota |
Model | Barracuda | Camry |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 545 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1364 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |