1969 Plymouth Barracuda vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Plymouth Barracuda (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Plymouth Barracuda should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Plymouth Barracuda | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Plymouth | Ford |
| Model | Barracuda | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5210 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2490 mm |
