1969 Plymouth Barracuda vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1969 Plymouth Barracuda.
Because 1969 Plymouth Barracuda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Plymouth Barracuda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Plymouth Barracuda (352 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C70. (350 Nm). This means 1969 Plymouth Barracuda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Plymouth Barracuda | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Plymouth | Volvo |
Model | Barracuda | C70 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 352 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2639 mm |