1969 Reliant Rebel vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 122 more horse power than 1969 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1969 Reliant Rebel.
Because 1969 Reliant Rebel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Reliant Rebel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Reliant Rebel. (52 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Reliant Rebel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Reliant Rebel | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Reliant | Holden |
| Model | Rebel | Epica |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 701 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2700 mm |
