1969 Reliant Scimitar vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1969 Reliant Scimitar. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1969 Reliant Scimitar.
Because 1969 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Reliant Scimitar | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Reliant | Ford |
| Model | Scimitar | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2992 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |
