1969 Renault 4 vs. 2000 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Mercury Cougar is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Cougar (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1969 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 660 kg more than 1969 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Renault 4 | 2000 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Renault | Mercury |
| Model | 4 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
