1969 Riley Kestrel vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Riley Kestrel (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1969 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Riley Kestrel | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | Kestrel | 66 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |