1969 Riley Kestrel vs. 1998 Toyota Caldina

To start off, 1998 Toyota Caldina is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Caldina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota Caldina (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota Caldina weights approximately 290 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota Caldina (155 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Toyota Caldina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Riley Kestrel 1998 Toyota Caldina
Make Riley Toyota
Model Kestrel Caldina
Year Released 1969 1998
Engine Size 1275 cc 1762 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 96 Nm 155 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2800 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 910 kg 1200 kg
Vehicle Length 3730 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2590 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 25 L 60 L