1969 Riley Kestrel vs. 2000 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2000 Toyota Crown is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Crown weights approximately 310 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2000 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Riley Kestrel | 2000 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | Kestrel | Crown |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1770 mm |
