1969 Riley Kestrel vs. 2000 Volvo S40
To start off, 2000 Volvo S40 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S40 (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S40 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S40 (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Riley Kestrel | 2000 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | Kestrel | S40 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |