1969 Riley Kestrel vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 293 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Riley Kestrel | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Riley | Holden |
| Model | Kestrel | UTE |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 96 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
