1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 452 kg more than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Jeep |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1648 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 87 L |
