1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Acura TL
To start off, 2010 Acura TL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 303 kg more than 2010 Acura TL.
Because 2010 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Acura TL | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Acura |
Model | Silver Shadow | TL |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4966 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 70 L |