1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1213 kg more than 2012 Ford Ka.
Because 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2012 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Ford |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Ka |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 887 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 40 L |
