1969 Seat 1430 vs. 1996 Toyota Carina

To start off, 1996 Toyota Carina is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 1430. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 1430 would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Carina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Carina (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1969 Seat 1430. (70 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Carina should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 1430. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Carina weights approximately 290 kg more than 1969 Seat 1430. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Seat 1430 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Seat 1430. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Carina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Carina (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Seat 1430. (112 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Carina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Seat 1430.

Compare all specifications: