1969 Seat 1500 vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForFour (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1969 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Seat 1500 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Because 1969 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Seat 1500 | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Seat | Smart |
| Model | 1500 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2510 mm |
