1969 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Seat 1500 (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Seat 1500 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Seat 1500 weights approximately 194 kg more than 2010 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Seat 1500 | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Seat | Ford |
Model | 1500 | Ka |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2450 mm |