1969 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Seat 1500 (71 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Seat 1500 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1969 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Seat 1500 | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Seat | Nissan |
| Model | 1500 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2360 mm |
