1969 Simca 1100 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Simca 1100 (57 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Simca 1100 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Simca 1100 weights approximately 184 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Simca 1100. (91 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Simca 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Simca 1100 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Simca | Zastava |
| Model | 1100 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1204 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 954 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2160 mm |
