1969 Simca 1100 vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1969 Simca 1100. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1969 Simca 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 341 kg more than 1969 Simca 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Simca 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Simca 1100. (91 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Simca 1100. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1969 Simca 1100 has manual transmission. 1969 Simca 1100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Simca 1100 | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Simca | Suzuki |
Model | 1100 | Equator |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1204 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 91 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 954 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 80 L |