1969 Skoda 110 L vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Skoda 110 L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Skoda 110 L would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1969 Skoda 110 L. (43 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1969 Skoda 110 L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 410 kg more than 1969 Skoda 110 L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Skoda 110 L is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Skoda 110 L. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Skoda 110 L. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Skoda 110 L. 2012 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1969 Skoda 110 L has manual transmission. 1969 Skoda 110 L will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Skoda 110 L | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Skoda | Renault |
| Model | 110 L | Clio |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 995 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |
