1969 Skoda 1202 vs. 1980 Holden Gemini
To start off, 1980 Holden Gemini is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Gemini (67 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1969 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Gemini should accelerate faster than 1969 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Skoda 1202 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1980 Holden Gemini.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Gemini (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Skoda 1202. (85 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1980 Holden Gemini will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Skoda 1202 | 1980 Holden Gemini | |
| Make | Skoda | Holden |
| Model | 1202 | Gemini |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1174 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2410 mm |
