1969 Skoda 1202 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 313 more horse power than 1969 Skoda 1202. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Skoda 1202.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Skoda 1202. (85 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Skoda 1202 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Skoda | Holden |
| Model | 1202 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1174 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
