1969 Steyr Haflinger vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1969 Steyr Haflinger. (27 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1969 Steyr Haflinger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Steyr Haflinger. (45 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Steyr Haflinger | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Steyr | Toyota |
Model | Haflinger | Matrix |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 641 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 2860 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2610 mm |