1969 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1969 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Suzuki Fronte | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Suzuki | Talbot |
| Model | Fronte | Baby |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 2690 cc |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1970 mm | 3130 mm |
