1969 Suzuki Fronte vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Suzuki Fronte | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Triumph |
| Model | Fronte | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 2498 cc |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1970 mm | 2700 mm |
