1969 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,436 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 1206 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Suzuki Fronte | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Fronte | Condor |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 2436 cc |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1646 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1970 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 70 L |
