1969 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C70 weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1969 Suzuki Fronte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Suzuki Fronte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
| Model | Fronte | C70 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 2400 cc |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1970 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |
