1969 Toyota 2000GT vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Toyota 2000GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Toyota 2000GT would be higher. At 1,987 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Toyota 2000GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1969 Toyota 2000GT. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1969 Toyota 2000GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Toyota 2000GT weights approximately 56 kg more than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Because 1969 Toyota 2000GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Toyota 2000GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Toyota 2000GT (180 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Celica. (170 Nm). This means 1969 Toyota 2000GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Toyota 2000GT | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | 2000GT | Celica |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1987 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |