1969 Toyota Corolla vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1969 Toyota Corolla. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1969 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1969 Toyota Corolla is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Toyota Corolla. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Toyota Corolla. (93 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Toyota Corolla | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Corolla | Micra |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1166 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 46 L |