1969 Toyota Crown vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Toyota Crown is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1969 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Toyota Crown (98 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Toyota Crown weights approximately 205 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Toyota Crown (200 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Toyota Crown | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Crown | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2599 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |
