1969 Triumph 1300 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 1300. (61 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Triumph 1300 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Triumph | Holden |
| Model | 1300 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 61 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2685 mm |
