1969 Triumph 2000 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Triumph 2000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 1969 Triumph 2000 and 1966 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 2000. (90 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 158 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Triumph 2000 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Triumph | Triumph |
| Model | 2000 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |
