1969 Triumph TR6 vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 1979 Mazda 626 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph TR6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph TR6 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Triumph TR6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Triumph TR6 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 1969 Triumph TR6 has manual transmission. 1969 Triumph TR6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Triumph TR6 | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Triumph | Mazda |
Model | TR6 | 626 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2520 mm |